About Us
Precision Tools for Mental Health & the Law
Global MH Services builds specialized digital applications for mental health professionals, forensic practitioners, and the legal community — where clinical science and legal standards intersect.
Our Mission
Closing the Gap Between Science and Practice
Mental health professionals and legal practitioners face a shared challenge: high-stakes decisions that demand rigorous, evidence-based tools — yet the software available to them rarely reflects the complexity of their work.
Global MH Services exists to change that. We identify specific, underserved problems at the intersection of psychiatry, psychology, and law, and we build focused applications that address them with clinical and legal precision.
Our first application, DaubertAnalyzer, addresses a critical gap in forensic practice — the absence of a structured, reliable reference for assessing whether psychological instruments meet Daubert admissibility standards.
How We Work
What Guides Every Application We Build
Clinical Expertise
Grounded in psychiatric and psychological science, our tools reflect deep domain knowledge — not surface-level approximations of clinical practice.
Legal Rigor
We build for the intersection of mental health and law, where precision matters and the stakes are high. Every feature is designed with forensic and legal standards in mind.
Evidence-Based Design
Our applications are built on peer-reviewed science and established clinical frameworks — not opinion or convention.
Purposeful Scope
We focus narrowly on problems that matter and are underserved. We do not build broad platforms; we build precise tools for specific, high-stakes professional needs.
Who We Serve
Built for Professionals at the Intersection
Forensic Psychologists
Practitioners who conduct psychological evaluations, administer instruments, and testify as expert witnesses — and need to ensure their methods will withstand Daubert scrutiny.
Forensic Psychiatrists
Physicians operating at the intersection of psychiatry and law who rely on psychological instruments and must be prepared to defend their scientific basis in court.
Other Expert Witnesses
Other physicians and scientists who are called to provide expert testimony in court and need to ensure their methods and instruments meet the scientific standards required for admissibility.
Attorneys
Litigators who challenge or defend psychological expert testimony, navigate mental health evidence, and need reliable reference tools to do so effectively.
Judges
Judicial officers who must evaluate the scientific basis of psychological evidence presented in court and make admissibility determinations under Daubert and related standards.
We Build Narrow, Deep, and Right
We are not building a platform. We are building a suite of precision instruments — each one designed to solve a specific, high-stakes problem that existing tools have failed to address. Every application we release reflects months of domain research, clinical consultation, and iterative refinement.
Get in Touch
Questions or Partnership Inquiries?
We welcome inquiries from practitioners, institutions, and organizations interested in our applications or in collaborating on future tools.